No,
Jim Bell isn't really dead; at least, not so far as I know. But his Frankenstein monster,
Red Bell Brewing, continues to haunt Philadelphia brewing. Witness
this misreasoned claptrap from the usually eruditer-than-this Joseph DiStefano, titled
Beer Will Save America! Funny. DiStefano is bringing up the proposal by Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Susan Collins (R-Maine) to
lower the federal tax on craft beer. Kerry says it will create jobs (
it will), Jim Koch of Boston Beer points out that craft brewing is one of the few success stories in the recession (
it sure as hell is), and the
Wall Street Journal says the tax cut will help the craft brewing industry (well,
duh).
But DiStefano says
"We've been this way before." He opens up the
Scary Closet and brings out the shaggy boogiemen of
Red Bell and Independence (and not even the
right Independence, you big dope; that link goes to the closed
brewpub) as being "
among the many beermakers backed by the taxpayer-subsidized U.S. Small Business Administration in the late 1990s; both
also sold shares to the general public; both are among the
many investor- and taxpayer-subsidized brands that
flopped."
Well, imagine that: there are businesses that
sold stock and went under. That couldn't have anything to do with how the
Inquirer sucked up to Jim Bell and
printed any damned bullshit he sent them, could it? As far as that goes, "investor-subsidized"? What the hell's that? The shareholders
made an investment, they
took a risk. If they'd gotten
bailed out, that would have been a subsidy. But small brewers don't get bailed out, they just close.
But the main point? This isn't even a subsidy! The Feds raised the beer tax back in 1991, the senators want to roll that back -- like every other part of the 1991 tax increase, like the luxury tax on
yachts that somehow got repealed... -- they're not going to SPEND money on this 'stimulus package,'
the brewers are going to do that.
Then he gets
silly: "What's the big deal with small-batch beers? Yes, they probably taste better. Yes, they're definitely
winning market share from Bud and Miller and Coors over the years.
So much that the giants have been closing and consolidating plants and selling out to foreign owners."
Okay,
no. Much as this thought leads beer geeks to turn off the lights and
fondle themselves in front of the gently glowing screen of a computer locked on
ratebeer.com, it's
simply not true. The "small-batch beers" just are not selling enough to have caused the "selling out to foreign owners." The big guys have been
consolidating to save costs and boost market share, and right now it's the foreigners turn to buy. It's got
nothing to do with craft beer, which is still under 5% of the market. You want to
point a finger, point it at
Corona and Heineken, which have taken three
times the share away from the big brewers. So DiStefano is either
ignorant, or
misleading you. Take your pick.
It's the
conclusion that's the kicker, though:
"But does that really add up to more and better jobs that merit public subsidies?" Well, yes, it
does add up to more jobs. Period. Give craft brewers a tax break, and I guarantee, they will SPEND that money on new hires, on
better benefits for the workers they do have, on
solid industrial equipment, on advertising and promotions. They won't
squirrel it away in a tax break somewhere, or send it overseas. Which, I would think, would be a GREAT way to get an
effective stimulus activity out of...wait, that's right, it's
NOT a public subsidy! That would be if the government GAVE THEM MONEY. But we're not even talking about giving them money, we're just talking about TAKING LESS AWAY FROM THEM.
Am I wrong? Is it really a "public subsidy" when you
cut back on an excise tax that shouldn't even be there in the first place? Or is this just
one more example of how the brewing industry (and the spirits and wine biz) is treated unfairly because everyone is scared to death of alcohol? I'll tell you what, Mister DiStefano, I would much rather see
taxes ratcheted back on a growing, thriving
production industry than see government funds
given to the banking industry. How about that, fella?